Skip to main content
Home
Home

Proving Up Publications as Prior Art in IPR Proceedings After Hulu

Proving Up Publications as Prior Art in IPR Proceedings After Hulu

Supreme Court

Imagine the following scenario.

A product manual contains disclosures that mirror the claims of a patent that a competitor has been using to threaten your company. The cover of the reference bears a 2010 copyright date, which is a full two years before the competitor filed its patent. If this manual is provided in an inter partes review (IPR) against your competitor's patent, it would need to be proven up as prior art. How do you do that?

In Hulu, LLC v. Sound View Innovations, LLC, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board offered a precedential opinion on the topic. Here we examine that decision and its implications for IPR practitioners. Read the full publication.

This article was also published in IP Magazine on July 09, 2020.

Print and share

Authors

Profile Picture
Partner
MBombach@perkinscoie.com

Notice

Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.

858.720.5747
Profile Picture
Partner
BMWhite@perkinscoie.com

Notice

Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.

202.654.6206

Explore more in

Home
Jump back to top