Skip to main content
Home
Home

庞米格 Miguel J. Bombach

Profile photo for Miguel J. Bombach
Profile photo for Miguel J. Bombach
合伙人

庞米格 Miguel J. Bombach

Miguel 在联邦法院和专利审判和上诉委员会(PTAB)处理专利案件的审理和诉讼工作。他不仅审理了多起联邦陪审团案件,还代表专利所有人和挑战者在 PTAB 成功领导并解决了众多专利案件。

Miguel Bombach 在电气工程和计算机科学方面拥有丰富的经验。在进入法学院之前,他曾担任电气工程师从事雷达控制系统的工作。作为一名律师,他在多个技术领域处理超过 100 宗案件,包括例如 LED 照明、电源转换器、存储器、半导体设备、无线数据传输系统(OFDM)以及其他与计算机科学相关的领域。他在 OFDM 和 LED 系统的专利申请以及大型专利组合分析(用于收购、许可和主张)方面也极富经验。

Miguel 在游戏领域亦拥有丰富经验。攻读大学之前,他作为韩国首尔的一名赞助电竞选手,曾多次出现在网络和有线电视播出的电竞联赛中。此外,他还在知识产权领域为众多游戏客户提供法律服务。

教育与证书

教育

  • 纽约大学法学院, J.D., 2010
  • 德克萨斯大学埃尔帕索分校, Bachelor of Science, 电气工程, 优等生, 2005

律师和法庭资格

  • 美国加利福尼亚州
  • 美国专利商标局

相关工作经历

  • 美富律师事务所 (Morrison & Foerster, LLP),加州圣地亚哥, 律师,2011;暑期实习, 2008, 2009
  • 美国雷神防御系统公司 (Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems),马萨诸塞州图克斯伯里,电气工程师 2006 - 2007

代理经验

Inter Partes Reviews

Petition for Inter Partes Review by HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corp.

Counsel for petitioner HTC in two IPRs relating to near field communication technologies. All challenged claims in both IPRs were deemed un-patentable via final written decision.

Petition for Inter Partes Review by Netflix, Inc. and Roku, Inc.

Counsel for petitioners Netflix and Roku in IPRs relating to media streaming. Out of six petitions filed, all were instituted. Case settled shortly after institution.

Petition for Inter Partes Review by kCura, LLC

Counsel for petitioner kCura in an IPRs relating to document searching. All claims of challenged patent instituted.

Petition for Inter Partes Review by T-Mobile US, Inc.

Counsel for petitioner T-Mobile in two IPRs against two patents relating to telecommunication networks. Both IPRs were instituted.

Patent Prosecution

Prosecuted patents for various companies, including ZTE Corp, Apple Inc.*, Kyocera Corp.* and others in a variety of technological fields, such as displays, OFDM transmission systems and networks, logic control systems, optical modulation systems, wavefront optics, e-commerce systems, wireless telephones, cloud computing systems and mechanical actuators and tools, among others.

Patent Litigation

ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research LLC

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for defendant ASUS in patent litigation relating to memory and semiconductor devices.

NFC Technology, LLC v. HTC America, Inc. et al.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for defendant HTC in patent litigation concerning near field communication and asserted claims invalidated before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board.; pending appeal.

Orostream LLC v. NHL Interactive Cyber Enterprises, LLC/Zuffa, LLC

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for defendants NHL and Zuffa in patent litigation relating to dynamic video delivery; patent invalidated as being subject matter ineligible.

Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Hulu, LLC/Netflix, Inc./Roku, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Counsel for defendants Hulu, Netflix and Roku in patent litigation relating to media streaming.

Bradium Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corp.

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for Microsoft in patent litigation relating to mapping and imagery display.

Transcenic Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for Microsoft in patent litigation relating to mapping and imagery display.

StylePath, Inc. v. Just Fabulous, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Counsel for Just Fabulous in patent litigation related to e-commerce websites.

Clouding IP LLC v. Microsoft Corporation/Amazon Inc. et al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for defendant Amazon and Microsoft in patent litigation relating to cloud computing.

Immersion Corporation v. HTC Corporation et. al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for defendant HTC in patent litigation relating to haptics in mobile phones.

Electronic Imaging Devices, 337-TA-850

International Trade Commission
Counsel for respondents HTC Corporation and HTC America Inc. in patent investigation relating to camera operating system functionality.

EchoStar Technologies Corporation v. TiVo Inc. et al.*

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for EchoStar in patent litigation relating to set-top boxes.

Altera Corp. v. LSI Corp.*

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for plaintiff Altera in patent litigation relating to memory and transistor devices.

 

*Prior Experience

Home
Jump back to top