Skip to main content
Home
Home

John D. Esterhay

Profile photo for John D. Esterhay
Profile photo for John D. Esterhay
合伙人

John D. Esterhay

John Esterhay 是本所诉讼业务组合伙人。作为一名拥有材料科学与工程学位的律师,John 能够运用其独特的技术背景,成功地代表公司处理涉及尖端技术问题的包括专利、商业秘密、合同违约及商业侵权在内的复杂商业诉讼。

在从事法律职业之前,John 曾在美国能源部劳伦斯利弗莫尔国家实验室工作,并在美国国家安全局学习密码分析技术。这种广博的技术经验使其法律实践能够跨越各种技术领域,例如先进的模拟和混合信号半导体、同步降压转换器、多相控制器、电源集成电路、CMOS 图像传感器、无线和蜂窝网络通信、散热技术、固态驱动器、双倍数据速率同步动态随机存取存储器、光学、电子商务、移动应用技术、触摸传感器、医疗、电力存储、汽车以及除冰技术。

John 的客户群体同样具有多样化,从财富 500 强中规模最大的企业到面临“以公司为赌注”诉讼的细分市场制造商。John 在联邦地区法院处理数十起案件的经验帮助他积累了丰富的应对各种技术型诉讼的能力。

John 还积极践行公益法律服务,经常抵达蒂华纳-圣伊西德罗边境口岸的移民提供庇护程序。他成功地为多名在本国面临迫害、酷刑或更糟情况的公益客户获得庇护。为此他荣获公益服务奖,以表彰他对公益法律服务做出的突出贡献。

在法学院,John 担任《耶鲁法律与技术杂志》主编,该杂志专注于专利法领域的相关问题,以及更普遍的技术与法律交叉议题。

教育与证书

教育

  • 耶鲁大学法学院, J.D., 《耶鲁法律与科技杂志》主编, 2010
  • 哥伦比亚大学, 学士学位, 材料科学与工程学士, C·普雷斯考特·戴维斯奖学金, , 2007

律师和法庭资格

  • California
  • New York
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • 美国联邦巡回上诉法院
  • 美国加州中区联邦地区法院
  • 美国加州北区联邦地区法院
  • 美国加州南区联邦地区法院
  • 美国纽约州南区联邦地区法院
  • 美国德克萨斯州东区联邦地区法院
  • 美国德克萨斯州西区联邦地区法院
  • 美国科罗拉多州联邦地区法院
  • 美国佛罗里达州北区联邦地区法院

相关工作经历

  • 美国康涅狄格州布里奇波特地区检察官办公室,法律诉讼实习生,2008-2009
  • 美国司法部反恐科,华盛顿特区,暑期法律实习生,2008

专业认可

  • 被《最佳律师》评选为值得关注的律师,知识产权法;诉讼 - 知识产权, 2021-2024

  • 被 Casa Cornelia 法律中心授予公益服务奖,2018

代理经验

Patent Litigation

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Meraki Integrated Circuit (Shenzhen) Technology, Ltd.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Counsel for plaintiff Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. in a lawsuit currently pending before Judge Alan D. Albright alleging patent infringement of three patents, trade secret misappropriation, tortious interference and unfair competition related to synchronous rectification technology in AC/DC converters.

Sterno Home, Inc. v. L&L Candle Company, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Counsel for L&L Candle Company defendants in a lawsuit before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. alleging patent infringement on six patents related to flameless candles; settled favorably after a stay was granted for defendants.

Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Counsel for Largan Precision in a six-patent case before Judge Sabraw concerning optical lenses in smartphones, tablets, and other products; case terminated via settlement eight days before trial.

Largan Precision, Company Ltd. v. Genius Electronic Optical Co.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for Largan in patent litigation concerning optical lens structures; case terminated via settlement after motion for summary judgment of infringement was granted.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Starbucks Corp.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Counsel for Starbucks in pending patent litigation before Judge Sabraw related to mobile payment and mobile ordering; obtained dismissal on summary judgment motion based on Alice and Section 101.

Barkan Wireless Access Technologies, L.P. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for T-Mobile in a patent case related to wireless networking and related inter partes review (IPR) proceedings challenging patents at the U.S. Patent and Trademark office; case dismissed by plaintiff with prejudice after successful IPR petitions against the patents-in-suit.

Blue Spike, LLC v. InfoSonics corporation d/b/a Verykool

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for InfoSonics in patent case related to Address Space Layout Randomization (“ASLR”) technology.

Morpho Komodo LLC v. InfoSonics corporation d/b/a Verykool

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for InfoSonics in patent case related to digital signature technology.

Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC v. HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for HTC in a one-patent case before Magistrate Judge Laporte concerning camera, image filtering, and image transmission functionality in smartphones; case transferred to the Northern District of California; stayed during the pendency of an inter partes review trial involving the asserted patent; the parties jointly moved for entry of a stipulated order of dismissal of all claims with prejudice; the order was granted, terminating the litigation.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Silergy Corporation, Compal Electronics, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for Monolithic Power Systems in litigation including claims for breach of contract and infringement of three patents related to chip scale, flip chip and microelectronic packages for power integrated circuits; settled favorably.

ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for ASUS in a six-patent case before Judge Alsup and Judge Tigar concerning flash memory, SDDRAM memory, and image sensor components in ASUS PC-related products; settled favorably shortly before trial.

Round Rock Research v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. And ASUS Computer International

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for ASUS in a nine-patent case before Judge Andrews (DE) and Judge Wilken (NDCA) concerning DDR1-3 SDRAM memory (data strobe, ODT and write leveling), SSD NAND flash memory, LCD, Bluetooth, USB 3.0, BIOS, CMOS image sensor components in ASUS PC-related products; settled favorably.

TMC Aerospace, Inc v. Elbit Systems Limited and Elbit Systems of America

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Counsel for Elbit in a patent infringement and trade secret case related to de-icing technology on unmanned aerial vehicles designed for military use; settled favorably following successful partial motion to dismiss that eliminated all business tort claims.

Oy Ajat Ltd. v. Genoray Co. Ltd. And Genoray America, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Counsel for Genoray in a three-patent case before Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge David A. Baker concerning power supply and image processing for dental x-ray imaging equipment; settled favorably.

Shenzhen Auto-Vox Technology Co., Ltd., v. The Noco Company

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Counsel for Auto-Vox in litigation including claims tortious interference and declaratory judgment of noninfringement of a design patent, and declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability, cancellation, and non-infringement of a trademark; complaint dismissed.

Lund Motion Products, Inc. v. T-Max (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd., T-Max (Qingdao) Industrial Co., Ltd., T-Max (Qingdao) International Trading Co., Ltd., And T-Max Industrial (Hk) Co., Ltd.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Counsel for T-Max in a three-patent and one-copyright case before Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth concerning retractable vehicle step automotive accessories and related inter partes review (IPR) proceedings challenging patents at the U.S. Patent and Trademark office; pending.

In The Matter Of Certain Touchscreen Controllers And Products Containing Same, U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-957

Counsel for Respondents Shenzhen Huiding Technology Co., Ltd. (d.b.a. Goodix) and Goodix Technology Inc. in a four-patent investigation before ALJ Essex (later transferred to ALJ McNamara) concerning touchscreen controllers used in smartphones; settled favorably after the hearing. At the time of the hearing, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations recommended a finding of no violation. Participated in filing of nine inter partes review (IPR) petitions during the pendency of the investigation challenging the asserted patents, five of which were instituted and four pending at the time of settlement.

Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG v. Tektronix, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Counsel for Tektronix in a patent case before Judge S. James Otero concerning multi-domain test and measurement instruments; case settled favorably after claim construction order in defendant’s favor.

Trade Secret and other Complex Commercial Litigation

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Wei Dong and Lin Sheng

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. in a lawsuit currently pending before Judge Jeffrey S. White alleging breach of contract, fraud and violations of the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act.

John Ledgerwood & Uncle Biff’s Inc. v. Marlena Roldan and Uncle Biffs Solana Beach LLC

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Counsel for Defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of contract, trademark infringement, unfair competition and unjust enrichment; settled favorably and dismissed.

Decision Sciences International Corporation v. VoXcell Cloud LLC and AI Visualize Inc.

American Arbitration Association
Counsel for Claimant Decision Sciences in arbitration alleging breach of contract; first chair lead counsel for arbitration hearing, with order pending.

ValveTech, Inc. v. Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
Counsel for ValveTech, Inc. in a lawsuit before Chief Judge Frank P. Geraci, Jr. alleging breach of contract, trade secret misappropriation, and unfair competition; pending.

Vanguard Pai Lung, LLC et al. v. William Moody et al.

North Carolina Superior Court – Business Court Division
Counsel for Plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging fraud, embezzlement, tortious interference, and other business torts; pending.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Intersil Corporation

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for Monolithic Power Systems in litigation including claims for trade secret misappropriation, tortious interference, disparagement, defamation and unfair competition; pending.

IP Cube Partners Co., Ltd. v. Telecommunication Systems, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Counsel for TeleCommunication Systems Inc. in an IP asset sale contractual dispute before Judge Laura Taylor Swain and Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis; case dismissed due to settlement after motion to dismiss fraud and negligent misrepresentation counts was granted.

Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.*

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Eleventh Circuit
Counsel for Bank of America in breach of contract and fraud case related to credit facility of Fontainebleau Las Vegas hotel; settled favorably after summary judgment was granted.

Sacred Heart Health System Inc. et al. v. Humana Military Healthcare Services Inc.*

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Eleventh Circuit 
Counsel for Humana in breach of contract case related to insurance payments from insurer to hospital networks; settled favorably after class action certification was defeated on appeal at the Eleventh Circuit.

 

*Prior Firm Experience

Securities Litigation and Investigations

In re: Groupon Inc Securities Litigation*

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Counsel for underwriters of Groupon IPO; case against underwriters dismissed.

Monroe County Employees' Retirement System v. YPF Sociedad Anonima et al.*

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Counsel for underwriters of YPF bond issuance; case against underwriters dismissed.

Lucien Bebchuk v. Electronic Arts Inc.*

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Counsel for Electronic Arts in shareholder litigation; case dismissed.

SEC and FINRA investigations*

Counsel for major investment bank in multiple SEC and FINRA investigations into its high-frequency trading and dark pool trading platforms; all investigations resolved favorably for client.

Internal Securities-Related Investigation *

Counsel for Fortune 500 retailer in internal investigation of potential securities-law issues arising from CFO conduct; investigation resolved favorably for client.

 

*Prior Firm Experience

Pro Bono Litigation

Asylum Proceeding For Individual from Nigeria

Obtained asylum for a Christian university professor from Nigeria whose entire family was brutally murdered by the terrorist group Boko Haram.

Asylum Proceeding for Individual from Cameroon

Obtained asylum for an Anglophone activist from Cameroon who was beaten and tortured and faced indefinite detention by the ruling Francophone government.

Home
Jump back to top