Leveling the Playing Field? Developing Discovery Strategies in CFTC Civil Enforcement Actions
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Enforcement wields immense power in civil enforcement actions.
It often seeks financial sanctions, including hefty financial penalties, and injunctive relief that can strip individuals of their professional licenses and bar them from trading in the derivatives markets. It also enjoys information-gathering advantages: it can issue subpoenas, hold proffers, pay whistleblowers for assistance, and bolster its own investigative powers by working with other agencies.
While the CFTC engages in years-long fact gathering, its opponents may lack even the most basic information about the agency’s investigation. Recent discovery and due process decisions, however, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, have equipped defendants with affirmative measures to obtain additional information from the CFTC. This article discusses three types of material that litigants may consider pursuing to achieve greater fact-gathering parity while litigating against the CFTC: (i) exculpatory/Brady material, (ii) internal agency material, and (iii) joint fact-gathering material.
**This article was originally written and submitted by Shari Brandt and Colin Ceriello for this year’s ABA Derivatives and Futures Law Committee Winter Meeting. Perkins Coie retains sole copyright ownership of this Presentation and all associated rights to use, reproduce, license, distribute or display the Presentation.
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Explore more in
White Collar Briefly
Drawing from breaking news, ever changing government priorities, and significant judicial decisions, this blog from Perkins Coie’s White Collar and Investigations group highlights key considerations and offers practical insights aimed to guide corporate stakeholders and counselors through an evolving regulatory environment.