Skip to main content
Home
Home

Supreme Court Limits Federal Courts’ Jurisdiction to Enforce Arbitration Awards

Perkins on Privacy

Supreme Court Limits Federal Courts’ Jurisdiction to Enforce Arbitration Awards

A new U.S. Supreme Court decision holds that federal courts cannot enforce or vacate arbitration awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act unless they have an independent jurisdictional basis to consider the case.

Previously, many federal courts would "look through" an arbitration enforcement action to the subject of the underlying dispute when determining jurisdiction to enforce or vacate. However, the Supreme Court decided that an action to enforce an arbitral award is essentially a contractual interpretation case that belongs in state court, absent diversity of citizenship jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). As a result, most actions to enforce or vacate arbitration awards now must be brought in state courts.

Read More

Print and share

Explore more in

Blog series

Perkins on Privacy

Perkins on Privacy keeps you informed about the latest developments in privacy and data security law. Our insights are provided by Perkins Coie's Privacy & Security practice, recognized by Chambers as a leading firm in the field. 

View the blog
Home
Jump back to top